![]() |
Yogini, 1000-1050 India; Kannauj Uttar Pradesh state. |
Scholars Mark Singleton and Elizabeth De Michelis have
raised questions about claiming any continuity between what we practice and
call yoga today with the historical practices also called yoga causing some
discomfort for those of us who might like to think there is an authenticity to
what we do because it is connected to something much older, something that has
been practiced and refined for such a long time. It must be worthwhile if it has endured so
long. I confess to having some of these
sentiments myself and to my own squirmy feelings when reading these two authors
who have done such clear and careful research.
![]() |
My Yoga Ancestors: This collage symbolizes for me the bringing together of the ancestors and the modern, and the reverance that can be present in all forms of practice. |
And yet…I am drawn to the images and the bits of information
we have about the lives of this variety of people who practiced yoga and I want
to claim them as my ancestors. There is
a lovely series of paintings from the oldest known manual on asana. I do not
remember the date. It is, interestingly, written not in Sanskrit but in
Arabic. The author and artist is a Muslim
Sufi. Each image shows a man practicing
some kind of asana (seated) on a small platform with a little hut and some
mountains behind him. Each hut is
slightly different and each landscape has its own particular mountain and
clouds and sky. I can imagine some small
thread running from my own practice on a platform with mountains in the
background and my rather larger -- though not enormous by modern standards -- hut.
Although by the time of Krischamacharya bringing asana into
the modern world, women were not initially allowed to practice, I am pleased by
the images of yogini’s such as the one above, sword in one hand, sitting on an owl. I
am pleased to find women among the images. Much of the symbolism is a mystery
to me but I love the multiple arms in many of the images and the magenta
mountains and scenes of animals you have to look closely to find. The magnifying glasses they provide are helpful. It seems the painters must have used a brush
with one hair. The artist in me is
fascinated and the yoga practitioner is inspired. Here, they are not separate.
It seems to me as I view this exhibit that I am viewing
sacred art. What makes something sacred
and something else mundane? My Iphone
dictionary defines sacred as “dedicated or set apart for the worship of a
deity; entitled to reverence and respect” and mundane as “dull or ordinary,
commonplace.” Perhaps all art is sacred
and yet I am not quite sure. These
depictions of those who were so deeply committed to transforming themselves,
whatever we might think of their chosen method, calls to some deep part of my
being powerfully. Is it not possible
that these ancient yoga practitioners have somehow gifted our modern world with
a vast and varied sacred foundation from which we can draw from, if we choose
to, whether or not the connective thread is externally visible?
The exhibit makes the historical connections through
Yoganandra and Krischamacharya, both of whom were instrumental in bringing some
form of yoga to the West. Yogananda
interestingly, downplayed asana because of its association with extreme
practices such as laying on a bed of nails or standing on one foot for years. Krischamacharya developed the modern asana
practice we are familiar with.
In one large painting that includes many different yogis
doing many different practices with mountains and animals in the background,
the yogis who are practicing pranayama are levitating. I am reminded again of the mystery of
breath. It is mundane and it is
sacred.
No comments:
Post a Comment